Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Faust v. d. Meesenburg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Faust v. d. Meesenburg
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch and Dam Beere v. d. Meesenburg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Beere v. d. Meesenburg50.00011
    Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch50.00011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Ganna v. Hasenkamp25.00011
    Hermann v. Stellfelde25.00011
    Fina v. Neuenkämpen25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Foks v. Langer-Rau12.50011
    Finja v. Hasenkamp12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Effi v. Stellfelde12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Anka v. Raddetal6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Ronja v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Bessy v. Hasenkamp6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Dolly v. Langer-Rau6.25011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Hasko v. Linebrok6.25011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.24022
    Lukas v. Linduri6.24022
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Assi Chamavia3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Dachs v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Kora v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Cora v. Karwald3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s