Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Anton v. d. Insel Fanoe
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Anton v. d. Insel Fanoe
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lucky v. Heesenhof and Dam Pizi v. Forst Ostenwalde
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.930%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)69
    Ancestor Loss-7
    Ancestor Loss in %111.29 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lucky v. Heesenhof50.00011
    Dora v. Schönrain50.00011
    Leo v. Fränkischen Bauern50.00011
    Pizi v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno37.500211
    Illa v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Askan v. Iberg25.00011
    Cora v. Mittelrhein25.00011
    Lissi v. Forst Ostenwalde25.00011
    Faust v. d. Mainauen25.00011
    Bessy v. Schönrain25.00011
    Ivan v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst15.620321
    Hanno v. Emsdeich12.50011
    Gero v. Alt-Hümmling12.50011
    Blitz v. Rottenanger12.50011
    Greif v. Reitbach12.50022
    Inga v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Erle v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Xenia v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Dag v. Betzloh12.50011
    Freia v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Rena v. Elbufer12.50011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen12.50011
    Esta v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Ajax v. Eschbach12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri9.370211
    Maja v. Elbufer6.25011
    Pascha v. Elbufer6.25011
    Cid v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Assi v. Hegholz6.25011
    Chris v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Cita v. Hollbäck6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Otti v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Debby v. Emsdeich6.25011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Cilly v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling6.25011
    Aspe v. Betzloh6.25011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle6.25011
    Heidehexe v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Samson v. Linduri3.12011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Pom v. Minatal3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Aischa v. Heek3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Aska v. Forstkamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s