Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ajax v. Störenhaus
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ajax v. Störenhaus
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire King v. Fährhaus and Dam Olle v. Fährhaus
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)65
    Ancestor Loss-3
    Ancestor Loss in %104.84 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Mea v. d. Laarsche Velden50.00011
    King v. Fährhaus50.00011
    Olle v. Fährhaus50.00011
    Dolf v. Linduri50.00011
    Amsel v. d. Leda25.00011
    Dunja v. Reitbach25.00011
    Benn v. Moorkamp25.00011
    Basko v. Neuenhof25.00011
    Brit Uit de Lange Jammer25.00011
    Ben v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Vidar v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Adda v. Wetternwege25.00011
    Whisky v. Schwege12.50011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Falko v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Darex Z Plotmylku12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Westfalen's Cäsar12.50011
    Anka v. Duewelsknapp12.50011
    Wodan v. h. Westervlier12.50011
    Suko v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Britta v. Fährhaus12.50011
    Aloeke Loeke v. d. Berkenven12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Dina v. d. Sandhöhen12.50011
    Fango v. Waterkant12.50011
    Asso v. Stubben9.370211
    Minka v. Hulshof6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Arras v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Cuno v. Thülenhorst6.25011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Quarz v. Schwege6.25011
    Birko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Falco-Basco Van'T Faan6.25011
    Quinti v. Schwege6.25011
    Ir Z Jiv6.25011
    Cilly v. Waterkant6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Lotte v. d. Westervlier6.25011
    Lore v. Fleestedt6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Sultan v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller6.25011
    Ester v. Wendland6.25011
    Ara Z Dianina Udoli6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Westfalen's Artus6.25011
    Mirza v. d. Bruine Hoeve6.25011
    Gera v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg6.25011
    Hexe v. Schwege6.24022
    Atempo v. d. Eggemerigge6.24022
    Condor v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Adar Z Dubikova3.12011
    Cilli v. Woltershof3.12011
    Eibe v. Hahnenkamm3.12011
    Alf Chamavia3.12011
    Carke Z Drazne3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s