Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gitti v. Blanken-Diek
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gitti v. Blanken-Diek
    COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ivo v. Reitbach and Dam Perle v. Paradies
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.488%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Ivo v. Reitbach50.00011
    Perle v. Paradies50.00011
    Merle v. Paradies25.00011
    Gsellmann v. Buchheim25.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Gora v. Reitbach25.00011
    Samson v. Linduri15.620211
    Westfalen's Artus12.50011
    Aischa v. Heek12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Kimba v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Katteneck's Daisy12.50011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Hexe v. Paradies12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Igor v. Linebrok6.25011
    Kira v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Aenne v. Stockey6.25011
    Harras v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Asta v. Averbeck6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Brack v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.24022
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Orpheus v. Innviertel DK3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Clitt v. Westermoor DK3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Elfe v. Linebrok3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Laika v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Dana v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s