Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gitta v. Niederfeld
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gitta v. Niederfeld
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Conny v. Steinbachtal and Dam Biona v. Kirchenweiher
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.711%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)65
    Ancestor Loss-3
    Ancestor Loss in %104.84 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Westfalen's Cäsar50.00011
    Aika v. Eschbach50.00011
    Conny v. Steinbachtal50.00011
    Biona v. Kirchenweiher50.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz31.250211
    Arras v. Eikenloh25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Caj v. Alt-Hümmling25.00011
    Vyko v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Forelle v. Buchheim25.00011
    Anka v. Rothsee25.00011
    Gina v. Roonstein25.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer15.620211
    Dana v. Tillplatz15.620211
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden12.50011
    Bea v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei12.50011
    Freya v. Roonstein12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Unken v. Buchheim12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Westfalen's Anton12.50011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp12.50011
    Heido v. Lönsstein12.50022
    Racker v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Lucie Nelha12.50011
    Elch v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Igor v. Perverberg6.25011
    Queen v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Nixe v. Buchheim6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Jenny v. Huckberg6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Dargo v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Gauner v. Stockey6.25011
    Aloe v.d. Schorlemer'schen Rentei6.25011
    Bella v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Bautz v. d. Leda6.24022
    Gera v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Evita v. Stockey3.12011
    Kora v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Jasmin v. Buchheim3.12011
    Gitta v. Buchheim3.12011
    Andra v. Buchheim3.12011
    Lord v. Jurawald3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Alex v. Bannwald3.12011
    Baco v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Lilli v. Buchheim3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s