Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Sigma v. Schatzrain
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Sigma v. Schatzrain
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Akim v. Rothsee and Dam Okka v. Schatzrain
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Akim v. Rothsee50.00011
    Okka v. Schatzrain50.00011
    Chef v. Seulingswald25.00011
    Elch v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Mona v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Cora v. Deutschen Orden25.00011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Alexa v. Deutchen Orden12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Ibse v. Linebrok12.50011
    Helge v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Anton v. Keltenquell12.50011
    Aika v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Igor v. Perverberg12.50011
    Lord v. Jurawald9.370211
    Grille v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Tanja De Wynen6.25011
    Artus v. Elztal6.25011
    Dina v. Schatzrain6.25011
    Gitta v. Buchheim6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Xaver v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Solojäger's Monarch6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Jolly De Wynen3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011
    Asco v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Dax Nelha3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Distel v. Buchheim3.12011
    Laika v. Linduri3.12011
    Bessi v. Winterberg3.12011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Vulkan De Wynen3.12011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Alka v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Jola Nelha3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s