Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Verdi v. Buchheim
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Verdi v. Buchheim
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe and Dam Raizza v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)69
    Ancestor Loss-7
    Ancestor Loss in %111.29 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Raizza v. Buchheim50.00011
    Avanti v. d. Frankenhöhe50.00011
    Iska v. Erlengrund25.00011
    Aspe v. Betzloh25.00011
    Pascha v. Elbufer25.00011
    Schorsch v. d. Schmiede25.00011
    Egon v. Buchheim25.00011
    Jazz v. Buchheim25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Akim v. Rothsee12.50011
    Maja v. Elbufer12.50011
    Jana v. d. Riedleite12.50011
    Cilli v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Leonie v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Etzel v. Buchheim12.50011
    Esko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Boss v. Mellin12.50011
    Jessy v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Etzel Aus Moor Und Heide6.25011
    Ondra v. Stockey6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Foko v. Erlengrund6.25011
    Basko v. Tannengarten6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Bonie v. Keltenquell6.25011
    Nesta v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Dixi v. Elbufer6.25011
    Westfalen's Chef6.25011
    Anja v. Veybach6.25011
    Katteneck's Daisy6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Karlo v. Linebrok3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Aenne v. Stockey3.12011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern3.12011
    Milla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Jule v. Linduri3.12011
    Gusti v. Stockey3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Bonie v. Birkengehege3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ussa v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Dean v. d. Schmiede3.12011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Brack v. Kampstüh3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s