Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Donna Bavaria
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Donna Bavaria
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Juri v. Frochtmannshof and Dam Betty Blue Bavaria
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Juri v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Betty Blue Bavaria50.00011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese25.00011
    Jesko v. Heek25.00011
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Cora v. Heek12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Aron v. Averbeck12.50011
    Hardy v. Paradies12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Basco v. Matzental12.50011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.36033
    Linda v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Anka v. Heek6.25011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Samson v. Linduri6.25011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.24022
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Igor v. Linebrok3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Asta v. Averbeck3.12011
    Elko v. Huntetal3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Cord v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Bessy v. Ahnherrn3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s